SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Trauma
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jennett, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Glasgow Coma Scale: History and current practice

Bryan Jennett

Institute of Neurological Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland, bryan.jennett{at}ntlworld.com

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was devised to assess injury severity in a multi-centre study of outcome after severe brain damage. It uses unambiguous terms that are readily understood by a wide range of observers. Giving numbers to responses makes communication and display of responsiveness easy and the overall score allows classifi cation of overall severity of brain injury for triage and for epidemiological studies. The total score involves some loss of predictive information. Outcome correlates well with the early GCS both in head injuries and other intensive care patients. When early sedation and ventilation after head injury makes GCS assessment difficult, the motor score is often available and is a useful index of injury severity. The GCS also facilitates monitoring in the early stages after injury, allowing rapid detection of complications. Even among mild injuries (GCS 13- 15) the scale can discriminate between those more or less likely to have detectable brain damage and to be at risk of complications.

Key Words: coma • head injury • severity of brain dysfunction • predicting outcome • monitoring for complications • CT scan

Trauma, Vol. 4, No. 2, 91-103 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/1460408602ta233oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement