This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Khaled, M. Articles by Cox, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Female genital mutilation

Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, UK andbNew Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK

Charles Cox

Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, UK andbNew Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced worldwide, including in the UK. The term ‘female circumcision’ suggests a relatively benign procedure, inviting comparison with male circumcision, which, although usually medically unnecessary and uncomfortable, rarely causes long-term problems. In fact, the female procedure is responsible for long-term gynaecological morbidity and greatly increased mortality and morbidity in childbirth for both mother and baby.

For many reasons - cultural, religious and sexual - worldwide efforts to reduce the practice are meeting resistance. This paper sets out the methods and classification of FGM, the position of the World Health Organization and other international agencies, and considers the problems from a British perspective.

Key Words: circumcision • clitoridectomy • female genital mutilation • gynaecological complications • infibulation

Trauma, Vol. 2, No. 2, 161-167 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/146040860000200208


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?