SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Trauma
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cool, P.
Right arrow Articles by Grimer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pathological fractures of the extremities

Paul Cool

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, UK, pcool{at}netcomuk.co.uk

Rob Grimer

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Oncology Service, Birmingham, UK

Pathological fractures of the appendicular skeleton due to tumours are relatively uncommon. Patients who are older than 50 years are most likely to have a metastasis, while patients who are younger than 20 are more likely to have a primary bone neoplasm.

In all fractures, but especially those that present after minimal trauma, one should have a high index of suspicion that the fracture might be pathological. Correct diagnosis prior to treatment is essential and we have constructed a protocol for this. In the assessment of these tumours a multidisciplinary assessment with radiologist, pathologist, oncologist and orthopaedic surgeon, is essential. The patient will require both oncological and surgical treatment. The aims of surgical treatment are firstly to stabilize the fracture with a construct that will outlive the patient and second to improve the patient’s mobility and to relieve pain.

Advances in oncological treatment have prolonged the survival of patients with primary and metastatic bone disease. This puts increasing strains on the surgical construct, therefore the choice of surgical reconstruction needs to be carefully considered. We outline the assessment of a patient who presents with a pathological fracture in three phases and describe a treatment protocol.

Key Words: assessment • extremities • fracture • pathological • protocol • treatment

Trauma, Vol. 2, No. 2, 101-111 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/146040860000200202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement