SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Trauma
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McSwain, M. J
Right arrow Articles by McSwain, N. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pneumatic antisnock garment: state of the art at the turn of the century

Merry J McSwain

Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA

Norman E McSwain, Jr

Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA, nmcswai{at}tmcpop.tmc.tulane.edu

The pneumatic antishock garment (PASG) accomplishes in 1999 exactly what Crile postulated that it did in 1901. It increases blood pressure by increasing systemic vascular resistance. No published article counters this fact. The weakness that has become apparent is that this increase in blood pressure can also increase haemorrhage and therefore does not necessarily improve outcome in every patient. Patients in profound shock benefit from the reduction in the vascular space and increased systemic vascular resistance, without excessive additional blood loss. Patients without ongoing haemorrhage benefit from increased blood pressure. Patients with ongoing haemorrhage in the abdomen, retroperitoneal area and pelvis benefit as the rate of blood loss is reduced. The controversy that has been sparked by the device is `what is the end point for resuscitation?'. Two randomized studies using the same method for PASG application and large volume replacement of intravenous (iv) fluids has produced the same outcome. One study has been readily accepted while the other has not. If the PASG is bad for resuscitation then so is large volume iv fluid replacement. One cannot accept scientifically or logically one study without accepting the other. The current indications for PASG are haemorrhage control in the abdomen, retroperitoneum and pelvis, and short-term management of profound shock.

Key Words: pneumatic antishock garment (PASG) • military antishock trousers (MAST) • haemorrhage • shock • trauma

Trauma, Vol. 2, No. 1, 63-75 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/146040860000200106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TraumaHome page
M. J McSwain and N. E McSwain Jr
Pneumatic antisnock garment: state of the art at the turn of the century
Trauma, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 63 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement